This test pitted a 10.2 mm dynamic gym rope, against a section of spliced 4mm Amsteel (Dyneema, estimated 4000 lbs breaking strength). The two were connected via a 3/16” stainless quicklink. The rope lost.

 

How strong are those dinky 3/16" quicklinks? Like anything else, the answer depends on where you get them. The attached image shows the results of just one test to > 3280 lbs, where the 10.2 mm dynamic rope broke.  I used my jeep to provide the force, and measured the force with a 3-ton capacity crane scale. The crane scale has a time constant of about 1 second at best, so it generally won’t catch the peak force in a dynamic break test. The dynamic rope was connected to the quicklink, and to the jeep, with figure-8s-on bights, and that’s where the rope broke.


quicklink

 


The movie of the test is here. 

Where I note the rope broke, the wrong end is visible; I was holding the far end (which had been attached to the jeep) in my other hand, but that is out of camera.

 

Quicklinks normally fail at low stress when an improperly machined female nut slips off the male thread. In the tests I've seen, where quicklinks failed well below rated strength, the tester had typically bought a boxful of anonymous links on ebay, and the poorly-fitting threads (which were obvious at the start) deformed and pulled off at much less than 1000 lbs force.



I bought quicklinks from US Stainless, National Hardware (cheapest) and French Maillon Rapide (which means “quick link”) made by Peguet, and sacrificed 3 from each set of 10 for testing to 1000 lbs;. After tensioning, I was able to unscrew each one by hand or with slight wrench force.



The bad thing about small quicklinks, is that they put more strain on the rope, than much thicker links. The tight curve radius reduces rope strength, and cinches the rope around the metal so force doesn't equalize between strands in a quick pull.

 

I’ve watched youtube videos of pull tests on small quicklinks. I note that the EN standard for testing quicklinks requires pull by 12 mm diameter round pins on each end, whereas some tests used <8mm diameter pins (actually other quicklinks).  A metal quicklink is more likely to break when pulled by another small metal object, which basically applies a point force – especially a metal object with low radius.  In contrast my test involved soft, deformable ropes on opposing sides of the pull.

 

These results should not be too surprising. 10.2 mm dynamic ropes are not generally tested for breaking strength; they are tested via the UIAA protocol for multiple drops over an edge (simulating the last piece of protection) with an 80 kg weight. However, in straight pull tests, they do break at about 5000 lbs when there are no knots. A figure 8 reduces the strength to about 65%, so 3280 lbs is quite reasonable.