Do 5mm (vs 8mm) rapides cause undue force for rope pulls?
Let’s
compare forces required to pull 8.3mm polyester and
11mm nylon (dynamic) ropes through 5mm and 8mm rapides (thus bracketing
the 6mm and 7mm debate). We'll measure the force required to
pull the ropes up and through the quicklinks, against the
weight of a 5 lb dumbell.

You
can see the thickness of the rope made the greatest
difference; the size of the rapide was a relatively minor effect.
Possibly some of the extra force required for the 11mm dynamic rope,
is taken up by the energy of stretching. The
inefficiency of the pull over the 5mm link is a little greater – but
comparable
– to the inefficiency of pulling a rope over a carabiner. A 13mm rope
(13mm is
the inner diameter of curvature of a 5mm rapide) certainly will get
stuck; but
I don’t know any canyoneers who use ropes over 10mm.
How was the test done? I used a 44x2 lb AWS (CE-certified) hanging
scale, calibrated on small dumbbell weights. To record the forces,
I took videos of the digital screen with my smartphone attached to the
scale
through a flexible tripod, and used only the "plateau" forces. A fuller description of the test protocol is here.
Each
point on the plot represents 4 pull tests (hence the error bars). To
get a value for each of the four tests at each point on the plot, ~20
times were used to define the “plateau" on a single pull test, and I
averaged the 3 highest values from each plateau. I had the rapides hung
from the top of my
stairwell, and had ~20’ of rope up and through a rapide “pulley,” down
the
other side. The far side had a 5lb dumbbell, and I walked down the
stairs on
the other side, trying to maintain an even rate as I raised the
dumbell. The force went up as the weight was lifted, plateaued, then
went down
at the end of the test.